What people are saying about "The Treachery of Microtransactions"
The Treachery of Microtransactions
Comments have been closed for this comic.
over 5 years ago
To be fair, the Overwatch crates are just cosmetics and aren't p2w.
over 5 years ago
WERE DA FUK ARE THE MANN_CO SUPPLY CRATES
over 5 years ago
EA / Blizzard / Valve / Activision, etc: Ceci ne sont pas de putes.
over 5 years ago
Almost all loot boxes nowadays include a high chance of a significant perceived loss of value though. When you really want skins (or box exclusive skins) but get worthless sprays instead, how is that a return on your investment as you ended up with stuff you'll never use or never wanted.
over 5 years ago
@Bradley Hausfeld Hence why I added the caveat. For it not to be gambling, you have to always get a return on your investment. Which means getting the exact same amount that you put in at a minimum. Gambling is anytime you place a risk on your money and suffer a loss on your investment.
over 5 years ago
I personally like the way the artist also did a picture subtitled this continues to not be a pipe
over 5 years ago
Did...did I just get proper learnin' at Nerf Now? I like it! Very well done art too, matches the style.
over 5 years ago
Ah, I see you're a troll of culture as well.
over 5 years ago
@Peter Sinclair
Why the heck do you act like it MATTERS whether or not the gambling aspect has gameplay consequences? It doesn't.
You are paying for random chance items of random value and desirability. Whether it's P2W or not has zero bearing on the fact that it's still gambling.
over 5 years ago
The loot boxes you picked, however, all just provide cosmetic items. They don't change how the game works. The EA loot boxes, however, from the "surprise mechanics" comment, do have game-changing effects and do make the game pay-to-win.
over 5 years ago
This is /=\//<!/|/& brilliant.

10/10 would pay admission to see it as oil on canvas.
over 5 years ago
This is /=\//<!/|/& brilliant.

10/10 would pay admission to MIA to see it as oil on canvas.
over 5 years ago
@Jake Pizorno
I've never understood this logic as if so wouldn't lotteries just have to guarantee a minimum prize of 1c and then suddenly they're "not gambling" and don't have to follow regulations?
over 5 years ago
It isn't gambling per se, since there is always a return on your investment. Of course, who can say what the value of another skin is, or why certain things must repeatedly be drawn?
over 5 years ago
Actually, "gambling" is very often used like that in french.