Anne-Marie is right

Of course she would try to thotify and profit off that altercation.

it's co-op only, i don't know how it's getting this far

Why does everyone think that being a good game is going to force Pokemon to get better, they're rushing their games out so the anime, cards and toys all make them the real money, Palworld would have to start doing well in all 3 of those categories before the Pokemon company takes any notice

I'm a bit too cynical for that, honestly. If companies see Palworld do well, they'll imitate it in the worse, laziest way and it's gonna suck.

@Freezer One of the games is a RPG, the other game is a Sandbox Survival Game. Genre is completely different. Worlds are completely different. Game mechanics are mostly different. The only thing is the monsters in both games have some similarity.

To be honest, I look at Grizzbolt and do not see Pikachu. I see a yellow Totoro that can use a gun.

So Palworld is to Pokémon what Stardew Valley is to Harvest Moon/Story of Seasons? Am I reading this correctly.

The real threat is that companies like Microsoft or Ubisoft sees the runaway success and goes like: "Imagine if it had our AAA or... AAAA polish?" And then makes some giant thing that does in fact compete.

Or they could screw up and make it about the Rabbids. Everyone loves those. Right..? ^_^;;

It's like saying Arc: Survival Evolved is a Pokemon game.
They're different genres. I'm utterly confused by this 'drama'.