the choices in the witcher 3 were medicore at best
the expansions pretty much fixed those

only in the Witcher 1 and 2 you had REAL morally gray decisions
in the witcher 3 some choices basiclly have fuck all consequences

Or, you know, Igni the wizard.

Technically humans don't acquire sapience, the defining trait of humanity, until they're about three years old. Technically, you could let them all roast and it'd be about he same as letting it happen to piglets.

That person with the skull and stick is stupid if they think I will pick babies over the XP from ignoring the babies and killing them instead.

Wait this choice is shit, just go around and save all 6.

I know the Witcher 3 was supposed to be 'grey' and 'edgy' and 'really make you question' - but, so many times in this game, I got the overall feeling that - the world's going to burn the hell down no matter what I do. Who cares? Next quest...

God this quest was stupid -shakes head-

I just came in to say that i have to write a paper re: the trolley problem due tomorrow and all of my escapist procrastination is reminding me about it.

Kill the witch and consequently save all future babies that she would put in danger.

I thought the baby was fake to coax the demon to possess Geralt.

can u please try and do also tf2 photos plz especially about the " pyro upgrade"

can u please try and do also tf2 photos plz especially about the " pyro upgrade"

No, you don't Jet

Option C : make a mod and #$@! the system...

solution: use igni to extinguish the fire. gg ez no re

There's actually a 3rd option - do nothing. We don't negotiate with terrorists.

You dont do it in the end the end it was just pretending you did it without knowledge so you would feel guilty and pull the shadow monster out, it was a pretty good plan by the skelliga girl

By the time you've put out the fire, climbed up, got the cauldron down and be in a position of pulling the babies out of the cauldron, they would've all drowned in the water used to boil them anyway since they wouldn't be able to swim...so...might as well save the 6th...

trolley problem.jpg

Loved that quest.

Ah, those paladin induced faux morality tests. You can fall or you can fall. Choose your fate wisely.

But to me, the best in morality and choices was by far the first one. The third has a few moments, but overall it's not as cruel as the first was.

and why I can´t throw witch in the place of the sixth baby, use my aard sign to stop the fire and throw the witch in the fire pit and eat delicious witch roasted?

And did you do it? Threw him in the fire? :v

@Shellhit: A choice made simply for the sake of choosing is not much of a choice at all, though.

Just use Igni to get rid of the fire Geralt. THEY TAUGHT YOU THIS FOR THIS EXACT BABY SAVING REASON.

@GabeZhul: It's actually one of the themes in the original books, that sometimes you have to choose one of the several evil deeds and you can't stay neutral. Yeah.

@Censuur: Unfortunately true. CD Project was trying so hard to make a morally gray world they went a bit over the line. After about 20 hours I stopped caring about the long-term consequences of my choices, because I felt like I had no control over them.

It's a trick question. Saving the cauldron of babies means you agree with the premise that they're delicious, so you save the singular baby.

Also the faux morality choices are the worst part of this game, either they're nonsensical, false or completely worthless.

MULTI
TRACK
DRIFTING!

Chile's! Baby back ribs!