i think the biggest mistake PUBG made is when they try to attack fortnite on battle royal mode. I mean attacking other for a genre is a stupid move, that give a bad rep for you and good publication for them.
I really don't care battle royale or not, I play PUBG for ARMA-like ballistics and realistic guns / locations and huge open map. PUBG is closer to military sim, Fortnite is closer to something like overwatch with arcadey shooting. Ot each its own. I always wanted a milsim with matchmaking.
@Nick Merritt: shit man, shootmania, I thought that game was going to be huge for some reason, the trailer was epic at least.
i got a 3 pack with some friends and they barely played it if at all. Sigh.
"Personally, I'm just waiting for a class-based Battle Royale with Team Fortress / Overwatch gunplay and less focus on looting, more focus on shooting."
"Personally, I'm just waiting for a class-based Battle Royale with Team Fortress / Overwatch gunplay and less focus on looting, more focus on shooting."
So you mean paladins battlegrounds?
I've played all of 13 minutes of it 5 years ago so have no idea what it's like today, but ShootMania Storm seems to still be going pretty strong if the Steam News section is anything to go by.
@Boomfly The discussion on Paladins vs Overwatch has been done to death by now, and there is a ton of things that Hi-Rez did first that OW then took. Also, IMO, Paladins has more depth by far.
If only its matchmaking wasn't horribly broken to the point of unplayability...
Jo, check out paladins battle royale. It's what you want, though not out yet. Instead of scavenging you get buffs for kills, and the game's an overwatch clone.
actually a large battle royal that focused more on taking high ground and shooting as opposed to having to scavenge for guns sounds great.
I've play the free fortnite royal, it's frustrating getting killed before you even find a weapon.