[url=#user_comment_34515]@ME[/url] Yes. It is true.

[url=#user_comment_18569]@SRG[/url]: Actually, yes. Hitler served in World War I and actually had a stash like that.

Is true
the french live in holes

7 months later, I gotta point out to Lonescu the following: Rifle protection shields are, according to the article, MOUNTED ON WHEELS for ease of mobility.

Yeah, what you're runnin' around with there is, at best, gonna stop that knife. Maybe a shotgun blast.

That game just... gah. Just gah.

The weed leaves make you aim better...
Not the ones in game, though. Those are just for show.

soap?

While I agree that Riot Shields (made of Polycarbonate) shouldn't provide the amount of protection as the shields in MW2 do, I think that the shields used in Modern Warfare 2 are actually Ballistic Shields (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_shield), which are commonly mistaken for Riot Shields

Yeah, pretty much. I was totally turned off to MW2 by the whole pot reference thing.

not hitler, but the one who kick start the world war 1 have awesome moustache

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_fTM4aWTxis8/R8OdIQOEohI/AAAAAAAAABs/vXy8_unCzZM/s320/220px-Franz_ferdinand.jpg

see?

can't you also play as hitler with a handlebar stash in ww1?

4. so do other npc troops in WW2 games

5. in WW1 you can take down big ass zeppelin and less airstrike drama

2. Defenses sucked? you're not a mindless drone running to the enemy hail of fire do ya? and remember, old COD and MoH have trenches in them, and it worked.

3. Commanders sucked? for long as I remember a WW fps starring us fighting enemies, not waiting for some officers ordering you around

@hey-nony-nonymous

It never stop some game developers in making games right? from your argument it's like this

1. Weapon? It can be done, I've played a pc game called outlaws, old western themed fps from lucasarts, and it's excellent in utilizing old weapons (and remember, this is before WW1)

So... when will we have a next gen WW1 game?

emsfnse;gvn

Would YOU want to play as the French in WW1? Or the Bulgarians? CAN YOU NAME ONE GUN FROM BULGARIA MR FREEMAN? I THOUGHT NOT.

@ anonymoose Couple of reasons there are "no" WW1 shooters. I don't have enough room to detail them all, so i'll summarize. 1. Weapons sucked. 2. Defenses Sucked 3. Commanders sucked. 4. Troops were all cannon fodder. 5. Air combat was pretty boss though.

hur yeah

Oh! I see what you did there, Zeta...

I see.

...

You made a Fallout reference.

...

In a sarcastic manner.

War. War never changes.

A ww1 shooter would actually be interesting, it just wouldn't be based solely on combat. It would be like Touhou.

whoops, link to the pic not complete

http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/6927/007kk7.jpg

not my picture, I'm just googling it

WW1 can be made into game really, if you see soldiers modified with trench battle equipments you can imagine a game where you sneaking into enemy trenches and hectic close combats in trenches and tunnels, Like Anzac Vs Turkish Army in Gallipoli Campaign.

here a pic of trench armors
http://img392

I laughed, hard - the third frame is just great :)


and yes, money flies out of people if its a payback kill

I don't have MW2, but I have a question about a clip you linked... when you kill people, MONEY comes out? WTF?

wait, people actually play Modern Warfare 2 online?

lol wut

Weed shirts smuggled across the Canadian border? TRENDY

Lol, you're so right, having a riot shield makes you all but invincible..

The funny thing is, you get the Blunt Trauma title by using the shield.

CS will only be a good game when they turn the awp into a copy of sniper's rifle, so you cant kill someone with a shot at their fingers.

C'mon, it's just supposed to be fun, and it is.

He forgot to add the 'bunnyhopping' dual shotgun wielding soldiers in close quarters
It goes like this:
- keep sprinting till you face an enemy, usually when you just cross a corner.
- stop sprinting/just run and jump
- aim somewhere in the neighbourhood of the enemy
- press LMB and RMB
- win

@Albert Einstein:

You forget the mass legions of Roach-Riders

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought with, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

And about ww1 shooters, no smart company ain't gonna risk making a game which basic is concentrated on sitting in a trench for 3 months and than walking your ass 200 meters until the machinegun mows you down ;)

They'd have to invent a really funny way to respawn to make it playable :)

Oh God, the moment i saw the middle panel i instantly thought, Metal Slug rebels :)

Anybody with me? Good times.

I pity the foo that hasn't been overpowered by the awesomeness of my MOWHAWK GRENADE!!

For everyone saying the shield is a cheap tactic...just use semtax/grenade launcher..problem solved.

Throwing knives + Mohawks = instant win, guaranteed

Looks like you guys are looking for some more strategy. Go looking for the really obscure games. They're often really strategic. >_>

Thats what most shooters consit of today.... spawn, run to enemy, die, spawn, run to enemy die, repeat. Hes saying the change of scenery would be a breath of fresh air compared to WWII all the time.

Anonymoose: No WW1 shooters? The reason: Because in WW1 the main tatic of war was to jump out of your trench and charge across mines, barbed wire, and machine gun firing arcs. The game would consist of You spawn, charge, die, spawn, charge, die, spawn, charge, die ad infinite.

Someone wearing a tactical shield? in real life blast the shield with tons of heavy firepower, in games, shoot their legs

Riot shield doesnt work like that. Even in CS. if you got the riot shield around you you would still take damage from rifles and other shit. awp I think would take like a quarter health.

so when will modders remake cs 1.6 into modern warfare 2 and give all those begging pc users the dedication they need.

[url=#user_comment_18470]@tehspiah[/url] so we get surf maps and zombie games? wait no dedicated servers so it would be 1.6 but blander.

Tactical Shields! Haha. I remember lots of fun with those. We need to play more 1.6 at LANs...

to add on: This is going to be like the cs 1.6 days all over again!

[url=#user_comment_18447]@Tyler[/url], I believe you are looking for the campaign of Frontlines: Fuel of war. You have no name, and every time you die another member of your platoon just takes your place.

I did this on the first day that the game came out. STOP COPYING ME (in leave Britney alone voice) lol

wait is that french john mcclane?

AN IMAGE, and AN ARMY, not "a image", "a army"...
Also, TRUE.

*Flees the Halo Photo Note he made*

Switching to your knife is faster than reloading.....

WWII has EVERYDAY AMERICAN SOLDIER. RUN TIL YOU DON'T GET SHOT

YOU'D THINK THAT VALVE REMOVED THE SHIELD FROM CS1.6 IN CS:S BECAUSE OF BALANCING ISSUES. WHY CAN'T IW DO THE SAME?

Ahh yes....Modern Warfare...where men with plastic shields can survive the onslaught of a million bullets

fifth to comment

The little French mustache is a nice touch.

It'd be great if there was a game in which you were just as expendable as the next power-armor clad space marine.
Oh well, one can dream.

Why are there no WW1 shooters? Why! It'd be awesome!

Oh wow, first comment.